A stance and a writing activity
My friends, I had not intended to discuss this controversial subject at this particular time. However, I want you to know that I do not shun controversy. On the contrary, I will take a stand on any issue at any time, regardless of how fraught with controversy it might be. You have asked me how I feel about the science of reading. All right, here is how I feel about the science of reading.
If when you say the science of reading you mean a new dogma, a divisive doctrine, or five holy and complete principles that need no further research; if you mean it as a label that categorizes entire careers, researchers, and bodies of work as either compliant or harmful, that turns teachers to regret and shame, that is satisfied with itself and is resistant to change, that overemphasizes a singular aspect of reading while devaluing others, that is misguided by memes and trite remarks on social media, then certainly I am against it.
If by the science of reading you mean an invitation to reflect, a willingness to improve, and encouragement to stay curious; if you mean an honest appraisal of reading research, acknowledging and implementing best practices that are proven to be effective while leaving space for future research and our experience to guide us while we grow as teachers; if you mean researched-based methodologies that enable students to read effectively while showing them why becoming literate matters; if you mean the best pathway to empower students, the key to social mobility, access to the life-changing code that connects us with ourselves and others, that offers windows, mirrors, and doors to depth, perspective, and the richness of life, then certainly I am for it.
This is my stand. I will not retreat from it. I will not compromise.
This post used “The Whisky Speech” by Noah S. Sweat as a mentor text. This is a great way to get older students to consider different perspectives and craft a piece of writing about a controversial issue in a light yet powerful way.
I chose to copy the entire first and last paragraphs, because I wanted it to be immediately recognizable by those familiar with the original speech, but you could model how to put them in your own words if you wish.
Try it out in your classroom and let me know how it goes, or your share thoughts about the science of reading in the comments below.
Want more thoughts and resources on literacy? Subscribe below:
Check out the professional development series that engages students in your current curriculum while leveraging the power of the reading-writing connection.
9 responses to “If By the Science of Reading”
-
Your post on the science of reading is incredibly enlightening! As someone passionate about literacy, I found your insights into the “IF” model and its application in education to be both fascinating and valuable. Your dedication to promoting literacy through evidence-based practices is commendable. Keep up the excellent work!
-
Thank you for such an enlightening article which prompted me to think. Anything to improve teaching methods, help people become better readers and improve literacy development I am most interested in.
-
It has been horrifying to watch this new trend of policing books that I’ve been seeing across the country. Access to books should never be impeeded.
-
Great prospective on the science of reading. I found it very interested and along the lines of what we do in the marketing industry.
-
Well, I am a ghostwriter and reading is critical to my career. Each book I write for a client comes with a list of books I need to read – or, more likely, to skim.
-
Very interesting way of presenting the science of reading. This is such a helpful way to get students to look at writing differently.
-
Thank you for sharing this insightful piece on the science of reading. It’s refreshing to see a comprehensive breakdown of the multifaceted aspects involved in teaching reading effectively.
-
It’s about constantly reflecting on our teaching practices and being open to new research and methodologies to improve our instruction.
-
Ok, I have not thought a lot about the science of reading of but this was very interesting to read haha. Love your take on it.

Leave a Reply